Educational materials for a socio-ecological transformation

I don’t feel it

I don’t feel it?! A conversation about emotions in the climate crisis

The participants expand their view of the psycho-social effects of the climate crisis and global injustice through a guided meditation and reflections with emotion cards.

Learning objectives

The participants…

– broaden their view of the psycho-social effects of the climate crisis and global injustice

– find (initial) access to their own emotions regarding the climate crisis and other social challenges

– discover a connection with themselves and the world around them and feel strengthened in their ability to act

Procedure

Background

From a scientific perspective, there is clear evidence that emotion and cognition (i.e. feeling and understanding) are deeply intertwined and influence each other. People experience everything in an emotional-cognitive way. Even if emotions are not consciously perceived, they have a major influence on how people evaluate situations and how they behave. Emotions are psychophysical movements that are triggered by a situation. A conscious awareness of our emotions can provide us with information about our behaviour and the underlying needs.

Emotions also play a central role in the context of the climate crisis, global inequality and sustainability. For example, young people experience fear, helplessness, sadness, frustration and anger regarding the global present and future. At the same time, feelings such as hope and confidence are an important prerequisite for sustainable action. In educational work on these topics, it is therefore important on the one hand to give space to unpleasant emotions and to take them seriously instead of ignoring or pushing them away. On the other hand, it is also important to encourage positive emotions. These can promote the remodelling of synapse structures and thus learning processes, enable appreciative and complex relationships and inspire and stimulate sustainable, social action. Verbalising emotions can lead to a more conscious perception and a more reflective approach. It can also lead to the realisation that you are not alone with your own feelings.

This method is about enabling an initial approach to one’s own emotions in the context of the climate crisis and global contexts.

A mindful approach to oneself and the other participants is very important for the method. For the participants, this means paying attention to their own needs and only participating to the extent that they feel comfortable. It is important to remember that this is an educational event and not a therapeutic setting.

Preparation

The facilitator familiarises themselves with the accompanying text for the meditation. The cards with the emotions (see material for download) are printed out and cut out. It is advisable to print out at least two copies of each card and then have them ready during the session so that all participants have the entire selection available to them.

Execution

1. Guided meditation (10 -15 minutes)

The facilitator briefly explains the context of the method and why it is important to deal with emotions in the context of the climate crisis and global inequality. They can refer to the information provided in the background. They then lead them through a short meditation with the help of the accompanying text (see material for download).

2. Self-reflection (10 minutes)

The cards with emotions are then laid out openly in the room and the participants can walk around and take a card.

The facilitator emphasises that people can carry different emotions in their bodies. These emotions can feel stronger or weaker and be more or less conscious. The next exercise is about focussing on the emotion on the card. If the participants do not want to focus on the emotion on the card at the moment, they can put the card back and take another one. As soon as everyone has a card, the participants have a short time to focus on the emotion on their card. How do you recognise the emotion? How does it feel in the body? Where can you feel it?

3. Open sentences (30 minutes)

Then the participants come together in pairs and sit opposite each other for a dialogue exercise. They decide which of the two will begin to speak in the exercise.

The person has 12 minutes to answer the following questions (3 minutes per question).

Notes on how to conduct the conversation:

The questions are read out one after the other by the person leading the discussion. The first question is read out first and answered directly. After 3 minutes, the next question is read out and answered, and so on. The roles are then swapped. The person who listened first now answers the questions and the other person listens. There is no “right” or “wrong” here. It can help to remember the meditation exercise from the beginning so that you don’t just focus on your head when answering, but also involve your whole body. You can also pause or remain silent for a moment.

The other person listens attentively and focusses their attention on the person speaking. They treat the person speaking with openness and appreciation, do not interrupt them and do not share their own assessment, judgement or opinion. If desired, questions can be asked.

Finally, the participants have 5 minutes to reflect in pairs:

4. Evaluation (10-15 minutes)

Variants

An abbreviated version of this method is also suitable as an introduction to other methods on the climate crisis and global justice. The emotion cards are laid out in the room and the facilitator asks “When I think about the current situation in the world / the future of the world, what emotions do I feel?”. The participants can stand by the card that applies most and briefly discuss with other participants why they are standing here.

Digital version

The method can be carried out digitally with the following small adjustments:

The tips and notes for facilitators should be followed with care when using the digital version of the method. Here too, a certain level of trust between the participants and the facilitator is a prerequisite for the method. The digital space can feel less trusting for some participants. The atmosphere in the digital space can be more difficult for the facilitator to grasp. At the same time, the digital space offers low-threshold opportunities for participants to take care of themselves and, if necessary, withdraw from the exercise.

Tips and notes for facilitators

This exercise requires the participants to trust the group and the facilitator. Depending on the target group, it is possible that participants may not have consciously dealt with their own emotions before. It is therefore important to briefly explain beforehand what will happen during the exercise and to emphasise that the participants should participate to the extent that they feel comfortable.

The guided meditation offers an opportunity to strengthen the participants’ awareness of themselves and the world around them. The accompanying text (see material for download) can be individually changed or adapted by the facilitator. There should be enough time between each sentence for breathing and awareness.

For some target groups, it can be challenging to talk about their own emotions for a longer period of time. If necessary, the questions can be reduced in point 3. of the method. Open sentences and the time per person limited to a total of 5 minutes.

Possibilities for further work

Methods for alternatives, dream journey

Working material for download

Sources:

Prosperity and good life

What is meant by a good life or prosperity? Both ideas are discussed and placed in the context of global economic and political issues.

Learning objectives

The participants…

Procedure

(background)

In 2 groups, the participants define what they understand by either a good life or prosperity. After a presentation of the results, parallels and differences between the two concepts are discussed together and placed in the context of economic and political objectives.

Preparation

For a better orientation on the definitions of prosperity and good living, the facilitator should read the background text.

The following sentence beginnings are written on two different colored moderation cards:

Implementation

1. (5 minutes) The participants are divided into 2 groups of equal size and each group receives one of the prepared moderation cards.

2. (15 minutes) The groups now have time to complete the sentence. They then write their different interpretations of prosperity or a good life on moderation cards of the same color as a group result. Care should be taken to ensure that

– there is only one thought on each card

– written large and legibly

– spelling does not play a role

The groups cluster their results and find headings for the individual categories.

4. (10 minutes) Now everyone comes back together in plenary. First, the “prosperity” group presents its results and lays out all the moderation cards on the floor, then the “good life” group presents its results and lays out all the moderation cards next to the cards already on the floor. If the contents of the two groups’ results overlap, the cards are placed next to each other accordingly.

6 Reflection (15 minutes)

Now the group discusses the following key questions:

– Based on your results: Where do you see overlaps, where do you see differences between prosperity and the good life and how do you explain these?

– The political/social/economic focus is currently on prosperity. Do you know of any everyday examples that make it clear that the focus is on prosperity rather than the good life?

– One important example is the gross domestic product (GDP), which is used politically to measure the prosperity of our society. What does this say about our society/what are your thoughts on this?

– Possible final question: Would you have completed the sentences differently if they had been talking about you as individuals instead of you as a group?

Tips and hints for instructors

It makes sense to conclude with a common definition of prosperity. The approach of the good life (Buen Vivir) is currently being pursued in several Latin American countries and is defined as a national goal in the constitutions of Bolivia and Ecuador.

Possibilities for further work

This method is suitable as an introduction to the topic of prosperity. Various prosperity indicators can then be discussed, for example. A central question could be to what extent these indicators reflect our ideas of a good and satisfying life. The “How do we measure the good life?” method is suitable for this. (chapter 3).

The following methods can also be used for this topic:

Sources and further information

Duden Wirtschaft von A bis Z: Grundlagenwissen für Schule und Studium, Beruf und Alltag. 6. Aufl. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut 2016. Lizenzausgabe Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung 2016.

https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/lexika/lexikon-der-wirtschaft/21170/wohlstand

Duden Wirtschaft von A bis Z: Grundlagenwissen für Schule und Studium, Beruf und Alltag. 6. Aufl. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut 2016. Lizenzausgabe Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung 2016.

https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/lexika/lexikon-der-wirtschaft/21172/wohlstandsgesellschaft

Hartmut Rosa, Niko Paech, Friederike habeRmann, Frigga haug, Felix Wittmann und Lena Kirschenmann (2014). “Zeitwohlstand. wie wir anders arbeiten, nachhaltig wirtschaften und besser leben”. Konzeptwerk Neue Ökonomie e.V. oekom verlag. München, Deutschland.

Acosta, Alberto (2015). “Buen vivir. Vom Recht auf ein gutes Leben”. Oekom verlag München, Deutschland.

I.L.A. Kollektiv (Hrsg.) (2019). Das Gute Leben für Alle . Wege in die solidarische Lebensweise (seite 18). oekom. München, Deutschland.

Ecuadorianische Verfassung, Artikel 275. vom 20 Oktober 2008